By Patrick Strelka
In this installment of Précis AI’s Man vs Machine series, I break down my MLB postseason 2025 predictions, how the Wild Card series actually played out, where the models missed, and what we can expect heading into the Division Series.
I called every Wild Card game correctly with a perfect four-for-four with the Mariners, Yankees, Dodgers, and Cubs. The AI systems? Each missed at least one – hence challenging the idea that algorithms always have the edge. Let’s take a closer look:
When every model trips on the same matchup, that’s a clue: shared inputs can create shared blind spots.
Baseball is more than numbers and charts. Team spirit, late surges, match‑up edges, nagging injuries, clubhouse energy — they’re real, and they often don’t register cleanly in model inputs. A player with a sore shoulder won’t tank his WAR overnight, but he might change a series. A team riding a hot September can outperform its season-long mean.
We’ve already seen the models wobble even before the games started: in our series kickoff, Claude penciled in the Braves and ChatGPT still had the Mets on its bracket — neither belonged in this year’s postseason picture.
I’m keeping it straightforward:
The AIs mostly line up with me on the Yankees, Mariners, and Dodgers. Where we split is the NL: most models lean Brewers over my Cubs. And for an odd twist, Claude even floated the Braves in earlier DS logic — a reminder that model outputs are only as grounded as their inputs.
AI is phenomenal at scanning mountains of data and surfacing patterns. But it can struggle to read the moment — the mood in the dugout, the way a veteran steadies a bullpen, the confidence of a kid who just found his swing. The sweet spot is obvious: let AI handle the facts and probabilities, and let human judgment interpret the pulse of October.
As the Division Series gets underway, I’ve got the early lead. Will instinct keep me in front, or will the models regroup and surge over the next rounds? Either way, this experiment proves that in a world buzzing with new tech, human insight still matters — sometimes most when the margins are thinnest.